With 940 now officially vacant
Aaron Read
friedbagels@gmail.com
Tue Jun 22 12:29:19 EDT 2010
Besides not wanting to deal with the hassle inherent to such a treaty
negotiation when there's probably "more important" things to deal with,
Canada (and to a lesser extent, Mexico) have a vested interest in
keeping those vacant AM allotments exactly as they are: vacant.
Why should they allow US signals to start appearing more and more in
them, and inherently competing with their own domestic FM signals?
That's probably a more political issue than a practical one, but this is
all about politics so there you go.
This is all the more true with the English/French restrictions the CRTC
(it is the CRTC that does that, right?) imposes - they want to ensure
that the Canadian audience receives Canadian programming.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
Aaron Read | Finger Lakes Public Radio
friedbagels@gmail.com | General Manager (WEOS & WHWS-LP)
Geneva, NY 14456 | www.weos.org / www.whws.fm
scott@fybush.com scott@fybush.com
Tue Jun 22 07:25:53 EDT 2010
Canada's AM dial is now vastly underutilized, and Mexico is heading in
the same direction. Whether either nation has any interest in
renegotiating the treaties that now protect those emptying AM channels
is, of course, a matter more of politics than anything else, and I have
no clue as to the politics of the issue.
More information about the Boston-Radio-Interest
mailing list