North Dakota tower
Mon Jan 4 15:04:57 EST 2010
Garrett Wollman wrote:
> <<On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 14:35:57 -0500, Scott Fybush <email@example.com> said:
>> I wonder - and should remember to ask some of the tower experts I know
>> when next I see them - what the maximum practical height would be for a
>> uniform cross-section guyed steel tower of the KVLY type.
> Don't be shocked if they tell you it's less than 2063'....
> The Warsaw tower was 2121' and it failed. The KXJB tower was 2060'
> and it failed. There's not much margin for error in these super-tall
> guyed structures.
I wonder, too, if such a super-tall antenna works as well on digital UHF
as it did on analog VHF? Granted there's not much population directly
under the antenna, but still the usual UHF low-TPO/high-gain-antenna
seems to me as though it might still shoot a fair amount of signal over
the heads of the target audience.
Did the KVLY folks have any comments about their DTV coverage vs. analog?
More information about the Boston-Radio-Interest