WHDH blows off Leno - Why not both News and Leno using sub-channels
Fri Apr 3 12:16:58 EDT 2009
Sean Smyth wrote:
> On Fri, 4/3/09, John Bolduc <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Why couldn't Channel 7 Boston have both news and Leno at 10:00pm?
>> Leno on 7.1 and News on 7.3, or the other way around.
> Wouldn't placing Leno on any channel but the main channel bring on
> the same issues, re: violating the deal with NBC? Has this issue ever
> been litigated/ruled upon?
There are a couple of issues at play here.
NBC's affiliation agreement with WHDH probably predates digital
subchannels - but I would imagine it would be interpreted as requiring
the NBC programming, if carried at all, to be carried on 7.1.
Putting Leno on 7.3 would make him invisible to much of the potential
audience, since the subchannel, if carried on cable at all, would be up
on some digital tier. The more visible place to put Leno might be on 56.
That brings up another issue, which is the provision in FCC rules that
prohibits networks from mandating that affiliates carry any specific
programming, and requires networks to offer that programming to other
stations in the market if it's not cleared by the primary affiliate.
That rule dates back to the "Report on Chain Broadcasting" of 1939-1940,
when the FCC was concerned, not without reason, about the extent to
which networks were exercising total programming control over their
It's my impression that recent affiliation agreements have been written
in a way that may not (and remember, IANAL) be enforceable under those
The primary recourse networks are supposed to have when an affiliate
pre-empts too much of their programming is to switch affiliates at
renewal time (as CBS chose to do in 1972 when it learned how much local
programming WCVB planned to run)...but that's much harder to do when two
of the other "big four" stations in the market are O&Os and the third is
part of a very large non-O&O group with strong corporate ties to
More information about the Boston-Radio-Interest