Licensed to non-actual locations

[Howard Glazer]

----- Original Message -----
From: Brian Vita <brian_vita@cssinc.com>
To: A. Joseph Ross <joe@attorneyross.com>
Cc: <boston-radio-interest@lists.BostonRadio.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: Licensed to non-actual locations


> A. Joseph Ross wrote:
> > On 29 Jan 2008 at 22:39, Dave Doherty wrote:
> >
> >
> >> There's a lot of case law about New England towns because the legal
> >> organizations of communities are so different here than in the bulk of
> >> the country. I think it is likely that every square inch of New
> >> England belongs to some "town" or other. That is patently not true in
> >> other areas of the country, particularly the West.
> >>
> >
> > That certainly is true in Massachusetts.  When four towns were
> > abolished to create the Quabbin Reservoir in the 1930s, their
> > territory was annexed to surrounding towns.
> >
> >
> What were the four towns?
>
> Brian
>
>

Enfield, Greenwich, Prescott and Dana. Am I the 10th caller with the answer?
What do I win?

Howard