College Radio Today

[Scott Fybush]

Dan.Strassberg wrote:
> And this 19-year-old's opinion matters because the Times quoted her? I
> have to admit that it was a good snappy (even memorable) quote to end
> the story with, but that her opinion would be worth even the cost of the
> paper on which the times printed it is debateable.

I'm confused here. If the article is about college radio, and by 
extension the attitude college students have toward radio in general, 
wouldn't the opinion of a 19-year-old be relevant almost by definition?

s