WWZN to restructure Celtics rights?

[Sean Smyth]

On Thu, 27 May 2004 13:15:35, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> I think that this is predicated on remaining at 50 kW-U DA-2.  If a
> new owner gave up on the idea of 50 kW-N operation, some alternative
> sites would seem to be feasible.

How much power would they be able to run ND at night, let's say, without
infringing on WLAC's protected skywave contour? Aren't they pretty close to the
fringes of said contour already? 

If they could somehow run 5 kW-ND at night from somewhere, plenty of sites would
seem feasible -- maybe even the WRCA site, if/when the WUNR/WRCA proposed site
goes through.