A "Legal" 99.9 For Lawrence?

[Laurence Glavin]

Technically I believe you're right, with this caveat:
I've been in the private sector since leaving the military
(n.b. at no time during my active duty did we lose a war)
and when times got tough, some of my employers, especially
Wang Laboratories, froze salaries and discretionary
spending in order to improve EFFICIENCY, thus possibly
increasing the output expended for the same level
of funding.  This seems to have happened economy-
wide during this "jobless recovery".  To make this "on-topic"
for those who disdain digressions, this has probably happened
and may continue to happen at both family-owned and conglomerate-
owned radio stations here and elsewhere. (Boston is
not recovering as neatly from the recession as other parts of the country.)


>DATE: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 00:37:47 
>From: "A. Joseph Ross" <lawyer@attorneyross.com>
>To: <paul@03038.com>
>Cc: boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

>On 2 Jan 2004 at 6:55, Paul Hopfgarten wrote:
>
>> No, Mr Barrister, Level Funding is NOT a cut. Level Funding MEANS Level
>> Funding...
>
>When costs are increasing (as they always are), level funding (which does not deserve 
>capital letters) is a cut in the resources which the agency has available to do its job.
>
>-- 
>A. Joseph Ross, J.D.                           617.367.0468
> 15 Court Square, Suite 210                 lawyer@attorneyross.com
>Boston, MA 02108-2503           	         http://www.attorneyross.com
>



____________________________________________________________
Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail!
http://login.mail.lycos.com/r/referral?aid=27005