1.150 Now "Officially"(?) WTTT & Stunting w/"Danny Boy"s

[Dan Strassberg]

Joe: As you have read in numerous posts on this topic (only one of which was
mine), your answer of "yes" is incorrect. The correct answer, as applied to
over-the-air terrestrial analog broadcasting, is "no." Garrett provided the
most complete answer (that is, he wrote the first post in this thread that
included all of the pertinent qualifications) and he explained why there are
so many qualifications to the "no" answer. In any event, "no" is the correct
answer for the case at hand, which involves a terrestrial AM station.

Dan Strassberg, Contributing Editor
EDN Magazine | Reed Electronics Group | www.edn.com
Fax 707-215-6367 | StrassbergEDN@att.net
*** CONTACT ME BEFORE ATTEMPTING TO SEND ATTACHMENTS LARGER THAN 1 Mbyte ***

----- Original Message -----
From: A. Joseph Ross <lawyer@attorneyross.com>
To: <tc@chaostheory.com>
Cc: boston Radio Mailing List <bri@bostonradio.org>
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 12:27 AM
Subject: Re: 1.150 Now "Officially"(?) WTTT & Stunting w/"Danny Boy"s


> On 2 Nov 2003 at 10:15, tc@chaostheory.com wrote:
>
> > Now, on that point-- the song publishing would certainly be in the
public
> > domain, but wouldn't any recording of the song have a copyright on that
> > specific performance and still be subject to royalty?
>
> Yes.
>
> --
> A. Joseph Ross, J.D.                           617.367.0468
>  15 Court Square, Suite 210                 lawyer@attorneyross.com
> Boston, MA 02108-2503                    http://www.attorneyross.com
>
>