[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: O'Reilly no factor

To: <bri@bostonradio.org>
Subject: Re: O'Reilly no factor
From: "SteveOrdinetz" <steveord@bit-net.com>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 12:58:10 -0400 (EDT)
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <006e01c31001$8a2f4030$1a20a78e@6zgxxcaku97sfqu>
References: <001f01c30ffe$b602c310$83513f42@yourm3vezyx8af> <006e01c31001$8a2f4030$1a20a78e@6zgxxcaku97sfqu>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

Chris Beckwith wrote:
>
>> Drudge reports that Rush is beating O'Reilly handily in the ratings.
>
> It made me laugh when WGAN, thinking it was such a big coup,  picked up
> O'Reilly.  Then again, this is the station that thought Rick Emerson and
> Rush-wannabe Mike Gallagher were ratings winners.

Are you referring to the syndicated Mike Gallagher?  I'd consider him more
of a Leykis-wannabe...Rush (agree with him or not) is articulate and seems
to actually believe in the viewpoints he takes, the other 2 are simply
obnoxious loudmouths.

References:
- O'Reilly no factor
  - From: "Dan Billings" <billings@suscom-maine.net>
- Re: O'Reilly no factor
  - From: "Chris Beckwith" <beckwith@ime.net>

Prev by Date: Re: O'Reilly no factor
Next by Date: Re: O'Reilly no factor
Previous by thread: Re: O'Reilly no factor
Next by thread: Re: O'Reilly no factor
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread