Re: 560 WGAN

["Dan C." <dwcole@mediaone.net>]

On 16 Apr 2001, at 7:36, Dan Billings wrote:

> I don't think confusion was the main issue.  I think the idea was to
> be consistent with what people see on their dial.  Using 560 makes the
> station more consistent with the technology and more modern sounding. 
> WGAN was the only AM station in the market not using its full
> frequency on the air.


Nice try, but wrong.  We changed it for an entirely different reason. 
However, since I was not one of those involved in the reasons for the 
change, I will have to decline to say why it was made.   :)

Dan Cole
five-sixty WGAN