[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 560 WGAN

To: Dan Strassberg <Dan.Strassberg@att.net>
Subject: Re: 560 WGAN
From: umar@nerodia.wcrb.com
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 23:13:22 -0400 (EDT)
cc: "A. Joseph Ross" <lawyer@world.std.com>, Dib9@aol.com, boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org
In-Reply-To: <001e01c0c59e$4acfa240$1fca4e0c@dstrassberg.cahners.com>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

On Sun, 15 Apr 2001, Dan Strassberg wrote:

> I don't know about WBZ back then; I grew up in New York City. For sure, back
> in the 40s--and probably even earlier--WOR _always_ referrred to itself as
> 71 on the dial. I don't know when WOR made the switch from 71 to 710.

I remember old AM transistor radios that had dials marked
"55...6...7...8...9...10...11...12...13...14...15...16".

Rob Landry
umar@nerodia.wcrb.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 560 WGAN
  - From: "Bill O'Neill" <billo@shoreham.net>

References:
- Re: 560 WGAN
  - From: "Dan Strassberg" <Dan.Strassberg@att.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Boston's first radio announcer on WNAC radio
Next by Date: Re: new FM allocations?
Previous by thread: Re: 560 WGAN
Next by thread: Re: 560 WGAN
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread