[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Continental/MediaOne/AT&T/?

To: Kevin Vahey <crimson@channel1.com>
Subject: Re: Continental/MediaOne/AT&T/?
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman>
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 16:36:24 -0500 (EST)
Cc: boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10012231513190.28332-100000@user1.channel1.com>
References: <20001223195852.5539.qmail@web2005.mail.yahoo.com><Pine.BSF.4.05.10012231513190.28332-100000@user1.channel1.com>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

<<On Sat, 23 Dec 2000 15:15:47 -0500 (EST), Kevin Vahey <crimson@channel1.com> said:

> Comcast would be better for the consumers but don t discount COX only
> because with their RI and CT properties it would be a nice fit.

They can't sell to Time Warner, at least, because TW Cable is owned by
Time Warner Entertainment, 20% of which is owned by AT&T (through
subsidiary Liberty Media as well as directly) and which was the cause
of their regulatory rejection in the first place.

-GAWollman

References:
- Re: Continental/MediaOne/AT&T/?
  - From: Mark Shneyder <bostonradio@yahoo.com>
- Re: Continental/MediaOne/AT&T/?
  - From: Kevin Vahey <crimson@channel1.com>
- Re: Continental/MediaOne/AT&T/?
  - From: Kevin Vahey <crimson@channel1.com>

Prev by Date: Re: voice-tracking is the symptom, but it's not the disease
Next by Date: Re: Re: WSRO calls valuable?
Previous by thread: Re: Continental/MediaOne/AT&T/?
Next by thread: Re: Continental/MediaOne/AT&T/?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread