[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Mandatory licensing (was: Re: LPFM)

To: <rogerkirk@usa.net>
Subject: Re: Mandatory licensing (was: Re: LPFM)
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 17:35:09 -0500 (EST)
Cc: <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, <boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org>
In-Reply-To: <200001241738.AA477560884@mail.ttlc.net>
References: <200001241738.AA477560884@mail.ttlc.net>
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

<<On Mon, 24 Jan 2000 17:38:55 -0500, "Roger Kirk" <rogerkirk@usa.net> said:

> My understanding is that ASCAP, BMI & SESAC do not
> license the right to copy, rather the right to 
> perform (publicly).  [deleted]

Indeed it is so.  Both are exclusive rights of copyright holder (along
with the right to create derivative works).

What was the relevance of this fact to my explanation of mandatory
licensing?

-GAWollman

References:
- Re: Mandatory licensing (was: Re: LPFM)
  - From: "Roger Kirk" <rogerkirk@usa.net>
- Re: Mandatory licensing (was: Re: LPFM)
  - From: "Roger Kirk" <rogerkirk@usa.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Mandatory licensing (was: Re: LPFM)
Next by Date: LPFM ownership limits
Previous by thread: Re: Mandatory licensing (was: Re: LPFM)
Next by thread: LPFM ownership limits
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread