[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WNTN (was WPTR)

To: "Dan Strassberg" <Dan.Strassberg@worldnet.att.net>, mwaters@mail.wesleyan.edu (Martin J. Waters)
Subject: Re: WNTN (was WPTR)
From: "A. Joseph Ross" <lawyer@world.std.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 00:21:11 -0500
CC: boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org
In-reply-to: <v02140b01b4a392979ae5@[129.133.252.129]>
Organization: Law Office of A. Joseph Ross, J.D.
Sender: owner-boston-radio-interest@bostonradio.org

On 13 Jan 00,  Martin J. Waters wrote:

> >The reason that WJIB is in a different situation and that WNTN could be is
> >that, in their cases, the co-channel Class As are in Canada, and Class A
> >stations no longer receive any protection outside of their national
> >borders. This rule change anables US stations on foreign clear channels to
> >operate full time.
 
Where is the Class A station on WPTR's channel?


=============================================================
 A. Joseph Ross, J.D.                                 617.367.0468
 15 Court Square                             lawyer@world.std.com
 Boston, MA 02108-2503              http://world.std.com/~lawyer/
=============================================================

References:
- Re: WNTN (was WPTR)
  - From: mwaters@mail.wesleyan.edu (Martin J. Waters)

Prev by Date: Re: WPTR, again
Next by Date: AM propagation
Previous by thread: Re: WNTN (was WPTR)
Next by thread: Re: WNTN (was WPTR)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread